Look on the bright side. Old folks and poor people will find it MUCH harder to vote!

Boy, the bad news is all over the place.

  • Because of cuts in public education funding, Texas school districts may have to lay off as many as 100,000 teachers next fall.
  • Because our leaders believe we’d just rather not think about it, we haven’t raised gasoline taxes in more than 20 years. As a result (and because we’ve already borrowed $10 billion that will cost us about $20 billion to repay), there will be no money for new roads by 2012.
  • Medicaid funding could be cut by as much as 25 percent and the number of children on the CHIPS program nearly halved. Of course, these poor people will still be able to get medical care — at the emergency room (which is the most expensive medical care available).
  • Despite many state legislators having run on a “law and order” platform, we’ll be looking for reasons to let hardened criminals out of jail early because we simply can’t afford to keep them locked up. Besides, we’ll need the room to house the mentally ill since we’ll be closing the rest of the state-run mental hospitals.

But, by gosh, we’ve already put a crimp in all that fraudulent voting and an end to sanctuary cities, yes we did!

My smart mouth aside, all Texans should be profoundly worried about these issues. Besides being incredibly short-sighted, the first two issues will have a negative effect on the unemployment picture in the state.

Those are a lot of teachers who will need to find jobs. 100,000. Some of the larger school districts might be able to absorb some of their layoffs through attrition but places like Cameron and Rockdale won’t. Can anyone say, “12 percent  state unemployment?”

Further, a 25 percent reduction in state aid could cause many small communities (communities like Buckholts and Milano and Gause and Thrall) to simply lose their schools. They just won’t have a choice. We curtailed what a district can levy in taxes, so schools can’t go back to local tax payers for the difference any more.  I guess that makes Tea Party Republicans happy, though. No new taxes.

That second item is no laughing matter either. Remember all the road work around here over the last decade or so? Well, say goodbye to any more of that work — and all the jobs that kind of work brings. Heavy civil construction work like highways and bridges employs an awful lot of people and pays a danged good wage.

No new taxes = no new roads … and precious little road maintenance.

Tea Party Republicans are now in a position to govern this state. Governing means talking not about the size of government, but about the actual things government does: schools, prisons, roads, health care, the justice system.

Since we already spend far less on these things (well, except for prisons) than most any other state in the Union, they’re talking about Voter ID and sanctuary cities.

Advertisements

About Richard Stone

... is a husband, a father, a writer, a journalist, an activist, an avid reader of trash science fiction and an occasional folk/bluegrass guitar player. He loves to travel, UT sports, community theater and sharing a good bottle of wine with good friends.
This entry was posted in Tea Party Republicans, Texas Politics and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Look on the bright side. Old folks and poor people will find it MUCH harder to vote!

  1. Ken Esten Cooke says:

    Just finished reading the link below when your blog post arrived. Interesting how some governments are looking ahead while Texas languishes, all so our governor can brag he never raised taxes when he runs for president. Good points you made. God bless Texas, but, man, this guy is screwing it up big time.
    http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/editorial/outlook/7405365.html

  2. cowanl says:

    How many school administrators are being let go? The path is clear. Less tax revenue, less education funding, fewer teachers, less learning, more ignorance, more Tea Partiers demanding less taxes. It’s a great feedback loop.

    Why do we have over 1,000 Independent School Districts in Texas.? Wouldn’t one per county suffice? Think of the reduced duplication and economies of scale. Times are really hard. Example, the Ledge may have to eliminate funding for steroid testing of high school atheletes.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s